Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:22:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi Ashkan, > > I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature > set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS > because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. > > Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508>