From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 19:00:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30A416A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:00:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from parrot.aev.net (host29-15.pool8174.interbusiness.it [81.74.15.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29EB43D46 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-246-23.37-151.net24.it [151.37.23.246]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i81J2gnt050965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:02:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailer (xanatar.ventu [10.1.2.6]) by soth.ventu (8.13.1/8.12.10) with SMTP id i81J0StC095477 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:00:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-Id: <200409011900.i81J0StC095477@soth.ventu> To: Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:00:28 EST From: Andrea Venturoli X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Re: bridge + ip_alias --> SLOW!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrea Venturoli List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 19:00:49 -0000 ** Reply to note from "Chris Dionissopoulos[freemail]" Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:01:11 +0300 > Andrea, > Try something like this as alternative configuration: Thank you very much for the answer. Unfortunately I didn't want to mess remotely with this kind of configuration, so I waited until I could get my hands physically on the machine today. As I was explaining the matter to my customer, she happened to notice that the alias IP is no longer needed (was some kind of subscription); just wish she had told me *before* :) Alas, the machines fares good now with only xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and I don't like to experiment with a production machine, if it works. Still I don't know if the problem was FreeBSD or lied elsewhere, but I can't think of anything else, so it could be a good candidate for investigations, if I (or anyone else) ever happen to have a similar configuration to play freely with. Thanks a lot really. bye av.