From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 6 16:44:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E72737B403; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:44:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f56NiKP70905; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:44:20 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.1) id xma070890; Thu, 7 Jun 01 09:44:08 +1000 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f56Ni6567271; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:44:08 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:44:06 +1000 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-X-Sender: To: Boris Popov Cc: , Subject: Re: CFR: Fixes for nullfs in -stable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Boris, On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Boris Popov wrote: > I've mostly merged improvements done to nullfs in the -current to > RELENG_4 branch. Operations on mmaped files were fixed before and this > patch focused on the proper vnode locking. Is "nullfs" used by mount_null? If so, how far do these patches go towards making mount_null usable? (I'm not aware of the status of nullfs in current). Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message