From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 22 19:15:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284EA16A41F;
	Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:15:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1855143D53;
	Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:15:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 11BE73F76; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:15:17 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:15:16 -0600
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
Message-ID: <20051222191516.GA31197@soaustin.net>
References: <43A97F91.25406.FE677CB@dan.langille.org>
	<43AA4A03.27311.12FD3FCC@dan.langille.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43AA4A03.27311.12FD3FCC@dan.langille.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: varying PORTVERSION with OSVERSION
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:15:23 -0000

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:38:59AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> It'll be interesting to produce quite a bit of design and code to 
> cater for just a few ports.

As for portsmon, I plan to not worry about it :-)  I don't really think
it's worth the work to track it for these edge cases.  (Of course, portsmon
evaluates everything assuming i386, but that's another story).

mcl