From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 18:10:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FD2106566B for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2868FC18 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4OIABgB094430 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4OIABBv094429; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 GMT Message-Id: <201105241810.p4OIABBv094429@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Chris Rees Cc: Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Rees List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:10:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/148777; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: joeb@a1poweruser.com Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, joeb1@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:02:53 +0100 On 24 May 2011 17:48, wrote: > From: =A0 =A0 Chris Rees CMR> Hi Joe, CMR> CMR> I understand your frustration at the port taking a while to be CMR> committed, but you simply can't expect things to be committed when CMR> advice is ignored. CMR> CMR> Why are you still using ${CP} when you should be using CMR> ${INSTALL_DATA}, and ${CP} -r when you should be using CMR> ${COPYTREE_SHARE}? CMR> CMR> Why is the DISTFILES line commented rather than removed? CMR> CMR> Why aren't you handling configuration files properly [1]? CMR> CMR> Why have you included the WRKDIR in the shar? CMR> CMR> Why have you _still_ not run portlint? CMR> CMR> Also, your mailer is messing up the shar. You're better off putting it CMR> up on a site somewhere, I'll be happy to host a correct shar for you CMR> if you email it to me as a tar. > > > > > ################################################################ > > I dont know how you came to write the above. > If you read the last shar post to ports/148777 you will see that all thos= e > items have been corrected. Hands up, I'm sorry, you have corrected _two_ (not all) of the issues -- the WRKDIR in shar issue. You still haven't run portlint, aren't handling config files properly, nor have you used the correct method of installing a tree of files. I've fixed these issues for you, please approve [1]. Also, please fix your mailer to not use quoted-printable -- it upsets GNATS and means I have to cartwheel with sed and tr on your patches. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/qjail.shar