From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 17:06:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AEF1065676; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net) Received: from vniz.net (vniz.net [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116288FC19; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vniz.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1FGlMfE001875; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:47:22 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by localhost (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1FGlMWD001874; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:47:22 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:47:22 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120215164722.GA1693@vniz.net> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: linux-f10-flashplugin11 not works for 9-stable (Linuxulator?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:06:07 -0000 Having 9-stable and ports from Feb 14, all builded from sources, I get this commonly looking error attempting to view flash in FF 10.0.1: *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing down Looking into ktrace I found error reason: 82037 plugin-container CALL connect(0x16,0x2c04f9d4,0x42) 82037 plugin-container STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL, invalid } 82037 plugin-container NAMI "/tmp/_org_wrapper_NSPlugins_libflashplayer.so_82037-2_1804289383" 82037 plugin-container RET connect -1 errno 2 No such file or directory (repeated several times). This "invalid" in sockaddr looks familiar as for some time ago added sockaddr length checks our kernel, but as bz@ says this should be already fixed. Does anybody runs flash successfly on 9-stable? If yes, where else the problem can be? -- http://ache.vniz.net/