From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 27 18:36:38 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BE37E1
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AC7264A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6RIacqj045238
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 191750] archivers/xz -> 5.0.5, MAINTAINERSHIP, MIRROR
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: naddy@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-191750-13-AF8xsvPALu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191750

--- Comment #6 from Christian Weisgerber <naddy@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #4)
> what do you think about jharris' case given that you two were involved with
> the port removal?

I think it is generally a bad idea to have something both in ports and in base,
at least if libraries are involved.  Depending on the vagaries of the include
and linker path, ports build on a system with both installed will pick up
either the one or the other quasi-randomly.  This is particularly bad if the
port and base have different versions!

xz is very stable and I don't see why users of older releases would have to
have xz 5.0.5 NOW rather than waiting for it to trickle through from -CURRENT.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.