Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191750] archivers/xz -> 5.0.5, MAINTAINERSHIP, MIRROR Message-ID: <bug-191750-13-AF8xsvPALu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191750 --- Comment #6 from Christian Weisgerber <naddy@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #4) > what do you think about jharris' case given that you two were involved with > the port removal? I think it is generally a bad idea to have something both in ports and in base, at least if libraries are involved. Depending on the vagaries of the include and linker path, ports build on a system with both installed will pick up either the one or the other quasi-randomly. This is particularly bad if the port and base have different versions! xz is very stable and I don't see why users of older releases would have to have xz 5.0.5 NOW rather than waiting for it to trickle through from -CURRENT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191750-13-AF8xsvPALu>