From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 11 9:46:27 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 09:46:26 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from oden.exmandato.se (oden.exmandato.se [192.71.33.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C8637B404 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:46:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from servicefactory.se (root@oden.exmandato.se [192.71.33.1]) by oden.exmandato.se (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA08780 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:46:23 +0100 (MET) Sender: jonas@oden.exmandato.se Message-ID: <3A3504DC.9273A77A@servicefactory.se> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:46:20 +0100 From: Jonas Bulow X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kqueue microbenchmark results References: <20001024225637.A54554@prism.flugsvamp.com> <39F6655A.353FD236@alumni.caltech.edu> <20001025115457.X28123@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001025170117.C87091@prism.flugsvamp.com> <20001207154925.A25785@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <3A30E115.CF7C76E8@newsguy.com> <3A31120E.3536F07D@alumni.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dan Kegel wrote: ... > Don't jump to conclusions. He's honestly trying to > understand what the optimal interface would be. > Let him catch up. Help him understand the requirements > which motivated the kqueue design and why his proposed > system call does not meet them. > > His role right now is to keep the kernel as simple as possible. > You need to prove that his proposed interface is simpler than possible :-) A simple way to keep the kernel simple: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-09-013-20-NW-GN-KN :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message