Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:27:36 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com>
Cc:        martymac@FreeBSD.org, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>, python <python@FreeBSD.org>, Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: dvdvideo-20120126_1 failed on amd64 8]
Message-ID:  <4F8C1E48.7030300@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACi7718vHf%2Bfs4Qcwgiv4Gr7pJ4vUtfwLtT2u8tXOgEdqH2keA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1334481599.966.14.camel@hood.oook.cz> <CACi771_DiaJMXFYw0dyX97jok_G=6kkebdrjuenoYeSQD5jntg@mail.gmail.com> <4F8C1A09.3090703@FreeBSD.org> <CACi7718vHf%2Bfs4Qcwgiv4Gr7pJ4vUtfwLtT2u8tXOgEdqH2keA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012/04/16 15:16, wen heping wrote:
>
>
> 2012/4/16 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org <mailto:pav@freebsd.org>>
>
>     On 2012/04/16 10:47, wen heping wrote:
>
>         Hi, all:
>
>             I attached a patch to resole it .
>             Any comments?
>
>
>     Are you going to pass over _all_ py* ports with that plist magic?
>
>
> Not all, but those ports which could both build with python2 and python3.
>
> Even that, there are many plist should be modified. But currently I have
> no better resolve and I hope others
> have a simple way to resolve it.

How about modifying our python port to not install versioned .pyc files, 
like it used to? Would that be a big political problem in python world?

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F8C1E48.7030300>