Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:56:41 -0400 From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best console hardware monitor pkg? Message-ID: <55980239.9010601@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <5597FBCD.2060001@hiwaay.net> References: <559760A3.7000901@sneakertech.com> <20150704150742.cd7c045a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150704092041.03767068@seibercom.net> <5597F233.7090201@sneakertech.com> <20150704170548.fc12bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150704161736.7025b3e187c9efbe119b1cc6@sohara.org> <5597FACB.3050506@sneakertech.com> <5597FBCD.2060001@hiwaay.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> Counterintuitively this means that the package for xmbmon installs >>> mbmon. >> >> OK just to clarify: if you install xbmon through pkg, you also get >> mbmon as well (which can be used without X)? > > > You get mbmon & *not* xmbmon*, hence the counterintuitive assessment: Wait, the "xmbmon" package as installed though pkg doesn't actually install the X version? wat I guess that's technically good for my needs in this case, but I wonder about sanity levels here.... that's kind of a big mistake, and if future versions of the package flip things around then maybe I shouldn't trust it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55980239.9010601>