Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:48:29 +0100 From: Arjan.deVet@adv.iae.nl (Arjan de Vet) To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads Message-ID: <20000110224829.A24711@adv.iae.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10001061433220.9535-100000@rodan.syr.edu>; from cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 02:42:44PM -0500 References: <20000106095248.A10302@adv.iae.nl> <Pine.SOL.4.10.10001061433220.9535-100000@rodan.syr.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christopher Sedore wrote: >On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Arjan de Vet wrote: > >> Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> >> >This is very interesting data and I was just wondering about the >> >actual state of functionality in our AIO code just the other day, >> >oddly enough. Does anyone have a PR# for the mentioned patches? >> >> kern/12053 >> >> A Dec 16 version of the patch can be found at: >> >> http://tfeed.maxwell.syr.edu/aio-diff >> >> They won't apply cleanly because some new syscalls have been added. > >There may be another PR related too (although a quick search a few seconds >ago didn't show it)--this patch set also fixes a problem where signals >were not posted for aio completion under certain circumstances (the code >just wasn't there before). > >Just found the PR--kern/13075 Now that we've found the two PRs and a reasonable up to date version of the patch are these changes going to be committed? Or are they still under review? Just curious ;-). Arjan -- Arjan de Vet, Eindhoven, The Netherlands <Arjan.deVet@adv.iae.nl> URL: http://www.iae.nl/users/devet/ for PGP key: finger devet@iae.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000110224829.A24711>