From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 23 22:28:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C47AF7 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C89B34B6 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7NMSb2q045732 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:28:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 165970] [libc] [patch] strtonum() optimization Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:28:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pfg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:28:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165970 --- Comment #9 from Pedro F. Giffuni --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #7) > Created attachment 146180 [details] > Update for newer libc > > I brought a small cosmetic change from OpenBSD so the patch needed an update. > (I haven't tested it yet). For reference: I took the OpenBSD regression test (strtonumtest.c) and looped the tests 100000 times. With the patch we still pass the tests and I was able to measure a steady 7% performance improvement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.