From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 3 08:06:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7FE106564A for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 08:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ady@ady.ro) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2B18FC12 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 08:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ady@ady.ro) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1389776wfg.7 for ; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr4453238wfd.287.1217749310240; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.54.14 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <78cb3d3f0808030041w2e0627d4jacf5d0b4abaf0ce1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:41:50 +0200 From: "Adrian Penisoara" Sender: ady@ady.ro To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: <4657.1217747125@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4657.1217747125@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3afc65fe8f849f06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Bob Keyes Subject: Re: The BIND scandal X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:06:53 -0000 Hi, On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > The FreeBSD project has been attempted blackmailed many times over > the year, and it havn't worked yet, and it won't ever, if I can > prevent it. > Sorry to suddenly stump into this, but can we get a bit more background on what is being referred to here and also the initial mail ? Just point me to relevant references if there are any, besides [1]. Mind me, but I think this may not be the most professional way to deal with such situations and I hate to see such (kiddish ?) arguments flow by on a FreeBSD/security list... [1] http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2000/Dec/0317.html Thank you, Adrian.