Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 20:43:46 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports startup scripts Message-ID: <199509220143.UAA08476@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950920231752.22999B-100000@latte.eng.umd.edu> References: <9509210239.AA21415@asimov.volant.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.950920231752.22999B-100000@latte.eng.umd.edu>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@eng.umd.edu> wrote: >3) Removing the perceived bugs in that other system makes it different > from the original, displeasing those that happened to have a lot of > experience using it, and don't want to learn another. Nobody has a problem with changing things, just changing them without a good reason. Going to consistently running the shutdown scripts is a change for a good reason. Making the four basic levels mean something different is a bad one (especially since the one suggested doesn't provide for a way to say "shut down to halt").
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509220143.UAA08476>