From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 27 13:26:19 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA08638 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:26:19 -0800 Received: from star-gate.com (hasty.vip.best.com [204.156.141.143]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA08616 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:26:09 -0800 Received: from localhost.mcs.com (localhost.mcs.com [127.0.0.1]) by star-gate.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA02087; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:20:44 GMT Message-Id: <199503271320.NAA02087@star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: star-gate.com: Host localhost.mcs.com didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6alpha 2/16/95 To: Peter da Silva cc: fbsd@clem.systemsix.com (Steve Passe), hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:50:35 CST." <199503271950.NAA23147@bonkers.taronga.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:20:42 +0000 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>> Peter da Silva said: > > I never thought of that, I have run X11R6 on my 1.1.5.1 boxes since > > I first brought them up. Probably not... all I can say is try it > > and see. Would the first person to answer this question please > > post results? > > No, it doesn't work. > > Time to see what happens when you run an X11R5 and an X11R6 server concurren tly. > Is not a problem to run X11R5 binaries now to run X11R6 binaries with X11R5 libraries thats a different story. I would play around with LD_LIBRARY_PATH . Or if you are running X11R5 unless there is a great need to run X11R5 I would upgrade to X11R6. Amancio