From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Jun 14 20:20:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1C9B72F29; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73162195; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA19671; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:20:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1bCupO-0009Ak-82; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:20:50 +0300 Subject: Re: svn commit: r301602 - in head: . lib/libpam lib/libpam/libpam lib/libpam/libpam/security tools/build/mk To: Bryan Drewery References: <201606081147.u58BlJ8X099462@repo.freebsd.org> <15ae4cc5-c65f-49af-5456-07d2cf476337@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ngie Cooper , =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8rgrav?= , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:19:48 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15ae4cc5-c65f-49af-5456-07d2cf476337@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:20:54 -0000 On 14/06/2016 19:37, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Note this will also cause the OpenSSL bump in r301271 to break packages. > Ports OpenSSL is supposed to be +1 over what is in base but r301271 I am curious if it is r301271 (change of SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER C macro) or if it is the actual bump of base's libssl to version 8. And why. So that I know it from now on. -- Andriy Gapon