Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 23:48:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263353] lang/python3*: Fails to link with LTO: Python includes unconditionally adds -g to --with-lto Message-ID: <bug-263353-21822-iRKtqCUdLQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-263353-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-263353-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263353 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|patch, patch-ready, |needs-patch, needs-qa |regression | Flags|maintainer-feedback?(python |maintainer-feedback+ |@FreeBSD.org) | --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #6) The issue applies to multiple python ports, you are welcome to provide a pa= tch against all ports for consideration. The issue here is not about a perfect fix, its about your assumption that asking for additional details, testing or questions means someone is looking for a perfect fix, or in some manner, to block you. This is not the case. Please leave your frustrations at the Bugzilla door. In the mean time, since the LTO patch landed prematurely, it *is* indeed an option, and the report here is a symptom of the implementation of said opti= on, you are welcome to provide a separate patch removing LTO from OPTIONS_DEFAU= LT (for all python ports), which we're happy to approve once provided. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263353-21822-iRKtqCUdLQ>