Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 01:32:07 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>, Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/scsi st.c Message-ID: <199809030738.BAA07921@pluto.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Sep 1998 00:16:46 -0000." <199809030016.AAA01007@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Thanks for bothering to reply to my message about this change before
>> committing it.
>
>Relax, Justin. You're not the only one with deadlines and a workload.
This has nothing to do with my workload or that of anyone else. I have no
problem with changes going into current or stable to fix deficiencies in
the current SCSI system. What I don't want to see is new functionality
committed at roughly the same time to the system in different branches that
have different user interfaces ("mt comp" with different arguments or
behavior, "chio" providing different volume tag semantics).
Matt's been sitting on these changes for months. I don't understand the
urgency that required them to be committed tonight before addressing what
I consider valid issues. Why did Matt even bother to ask to have the
changes reviewed?
> Pot-kettle-black.
Why don't we stick with the issues.
--
Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809030738.BAA07921>