From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 16 17:40: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C6537B41E for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:40:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ubik.demon.co.uk ([194.222.125.229]) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16Fml3-0003TI-0K; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:39:59 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:37:54 +0000 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" From: Tony Subject: Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re: NFS: How to make FreeBSD fall on its face in one easy step ) References: <200112130608.fBD689K49906@apollo.backplane.com> <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>, Brandon D. Valentine writes > [snip] >but it still can't touch the FreeBSD NFS implementation. The more >robust you make it the easier it is for me to argue for deployment of >more FreeBSD systems in NFS server roles. The only advantage Linux has >got right now is XFS, which is admittedly a pretty large advantage on >multi terabyte filesystems where fsck is impossible. That is what I wanted to hear, an unambiguous argument that a solid implementation of JFS would be useful to some user segment. Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message