From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:59:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9EF16A598 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428E943CAA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1582813wxc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.29.2 with SMTP id c2mr7693257agc.1165877946042; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 26sm6583104aga.2006.12.11.14.59.05; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D75B85F; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F606B82C; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:11 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:10 -0000 On Monday December 11, 2006 at 05:09:01 (PM) James Long wrote: > By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and > and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a response > to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. Maybe it is just me, but I hate that Cc crap. I always end up with two copies of the same message. Unless the individual specifically requests to be Cc'd, I never utilize it. Besides, how hard is it to subscribe to a list, post your question and hopefully receive a satisfactory response and then terminate your association with the list if you are so inclined. I joined the 'Apache' forum just to get one simple answer, then exited. Not a big deal at all. Just my 2ยข. -- Gerard "When in doubt, cop an attitude."