From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 04:00:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F97316A4D3 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4143D5C for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9R40qXp059527 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9R40qFB059419; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 GMT Message-Id: <200410270400.i9R40qFB059419@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ken Smith Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ken Smith List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:00:52 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/72979; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ken Smith To: Ken Smith Cc: David Xu , Mikhail Teterin , Michael Nottebrock , re@freebsd.org, davidxu@t2t2.com, davidxu@viatech.com.cn, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:54:19 -0400 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:53:05PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > David, > > I think I have successfully tested your fix. Even if it doesn't wind > up fixing these problems it does fix something that shouldn't happen. > > Please commit to RELENG_5 and RELENG_5_3. If you are too busy to do > it can you let me know please? Sigh. Hold off a wee bit please. That test I sent eariler was 100% reproducible and your patch fixed that case. But I found someone else who was having similar problems and he reports he can still get stuck processes. I'll spend some time trying to reproduce his case to see if I can reliably make it happen somehow. He said with this patch it does change what happens - the process being debugged does notice that it gets hit with a sighup when he exits gdb but the process being debugged doesn't die. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |