From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 31 18:25:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA00365 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 18:25:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from stepahead.net (stepahead.net [205.161.119.233]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA00359 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 18:25:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (irq@localhost) by stepahead.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA01457; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 21:24:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 21:24:32 -0500 (EST) From: interrupt request To: Jack W Doyle cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vi question In-Reply-To: <19970331.191652.12022.0.N9OGK@juno.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk umm jack..that is one HELL of a lame signature file =================================================== interrupt request The Collective www.collective.org "We make the things that make communications free" On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Jack W Doyle wrote: > One question: How can I set vi to automatically wrap words like a > wordproc, with another alias to override that setting if I am to write > programs? > > Jack > > > You know you've been using UNIX enough when: > * You remember UNIX commands faster than those for DOS. > * You try to configure Win95 the same way you try to configure your X > window manager. > * Someone asks you what wordproc you use and you reply 'vi' (or your > favorite text editor). > * You type 'ls -a' instead of 'dir /w' in DOS. >