Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:25:32 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile (fwd) Message-ID: <20030830102532.GD88893@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030830025225.D15016@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030830025225.D15016@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:54:26AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Can someone please explain to me why fixing a plist necessitates bumping > portrevision? If I already have the port installed, the plist is already > broken. There is nothing about this fix that makes me want to reinstall > the port. There is for me -- I want the version of the port with the correct pkg-plist in case I want to deinstall the port and _not_ leave files/dirs behind. I wouldn't know if I have the correct version of the plist if they didn't bump PORTREVISION. --Stijn --=20 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/UHubY3r/tLQmfWcRAldEAJ4/lXvM+UxroArKO4PrxmMGtn5KZwCfbTie ibVOuC1qJ/QzuSKi/i0QCYs= =4RcH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dkEUBIird37B8yKS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030830102532.GD88893>