From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 19:56:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5336FB032E4 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E621FDD for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u35JufYS014426 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:56:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u35Jufsg014423; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:56:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:56:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: gyliamos@gmail.com cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X broken after upgrading - black screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:56:42 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:56:43 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016, Will Parsons wrote: > >> Please, is there anyone who can comment on the following? > > Just shotgun approaches. Has you rebuilt all of Xorg, or at least all of the > packages that the intel video driver depends on? Honest, I was more careful with testing the command than when writing "has you". > portmaster `pkg info -dq xf86-video-intel`