From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Jul 31 10:59:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA23263
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA23254
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 10:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost)
	by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id LAA17808;
	Thu, 31 Jul 1997 11:59:20 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA27798; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Shashi Joshi <shashi@shift-f1.com>
cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: So, lets have a checklist compiled (was Re: Security hole)
In-Reply-To: <199707301450.JAA25877@shift-f1.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970731115850.27274F-100000@alive.znep.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Shashi Joshi wrote:

> Now why would sendmail be in sbin when it is not purely a sysadmin tool
> only?

Because sbin is not for sysadmin tools.

man hier

Followups are probably best directed to chat.