Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Sep 2021 22:04:48 +0200
From:      Kristof Provost <kp@FreeBSD.org>
To:        =?utf-8?q?=C3=96zkan?= KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pf label $nr macro expand reproducable bug
Message-ID:  <9CA646C6-3902-43ED-9E5C-6BA1302B70BB@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AF_S5WrU%2Bhy6WCzuot33%2Bp_LtP6_7HPTFNMSxoevqM35g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAAcX-AFmFwyEK4uzK66LoBK2e6W0_-8ZkJju5jAfSYE7wmSjXA@mail.gmail.com> <90E32279-76C0-4D81-B209-BE85A181F874@FreeBSD.org> <CAAcX-AF_S5WrU%2Bhy6WCzuot33%2Bp_LtP6_7HPTFNMSxoevqM35g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Sep 2021, at 11:47, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote:
> Hi Kristof,
>
> I tried many things and I found the real problem to reproduce the bug.
> Tested with the latest stable/12.
> And also tested with Live CD without installing
> (https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/12.2/FreeBSD-12.=
2-STABLE-amd64-20210916-r370608-disc1.iso).
> The result is same.
>
> My determination is the problem in the rule optimizer of pf. You can
> see the difference with / without ruleset optimization.
> Without ruleset optimization, $nr macro expanding is true. otherwise fa=
lse.
>
Thanks! That=E2=80=99s a useful bit of extra information. I=E2=80=99ll tr=
y to find some time to debug this soon.

Best regards,
Kristof



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9CA646C6-3902-43ED-9E5C-6BA1302B70BB>