Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 23:37:31 -0500 (EST) From: Bill/Carolyn Pechter <pechter@shell.monmouth.com> To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey) Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: Demand loading (Re: FreeBSD, Zappa & PCI) Message-ID: <199601040437.XAA25924@shell.monmouth.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960103213250.12408D-100000@mocha.eng.umd.edu> from "Chuck Robey" at Jan 3, 96 09:35:59 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Chuck Robey chuckr@eng.umd.edu wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I don't have any personal antipathy against ELF (I must have missed > > Joerg's original post - I've only seen references in follow-ups) I > > just have an antipathy against: > > > > 2. Adopting new technologies before they're ready. Would anyone > > mind just a little if we waited for Linux to go to their second > > tools rev in their position as ELF-leader? :-) > > > > Jordan, I can understand your first argument, but since SVR4 has been > running ELF for quite some time now, well, the second argument is a > little harder to see, for me. Does ELF really still qualify as new > technology? > My latest Linux CD set has the Red Hat 2.1 set which is their second all ELF release. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Pechter/Carolyn Pechter | The postmaster always pings twice. Lakewood MicroSystems | 17 Meredith Drive, 908-389-3592 | Tinton Falls, NJ 07724 pechter@shell.monmouth.com |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601040437.XAA25924>