Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:11:35 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Gordon Tetlow" <gordon@tetlows.org> Cc: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice Message-ID: <86tzfdwnd4.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> (Gordon Tetlow's message of "Fri\, 27 Jun 2008 10\:37\:55 -0700") References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com> <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Gordon Tetlow" <gordon@tetlows.org> writes: > As an SCM expert at my place of employment, [...] As an SCM expert, you should know that neither CVS not Subversion are SCM tools. Neither are any of the other systems you mention, except perhaps, at a stretch, Perforce. They are version (or revision) control systems. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tzfdwnd4.fsf>