From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 17 00:10:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA10880 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 00:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA10740; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 00:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01791; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 08:34:35 +0200 (MET DST) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Terry Lambert , jehamby@lightside.com, jsigmon@www.hsc.wvu.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.x release question In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Oct 1996 18:25:54 PDT." <1295.845515554@time.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 08:34:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1789.845534074@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <1295.845515554@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> > I feel they had a perfectly valid point. >> >> Let them use union mounts... > >I see. The "let them eat cake" argument, eh? Well, Marie, we >don't have unionfs and the peasants don't have cake. :-) No no no! He's right. Devfs should stack on top of a regular directory, and pick up perms,owners and groups from there. They way it works is this: jkh$ cp /dev/null foo DEVFS: "null" do we have that ? yes, Lets ask below then: UFS: "null" ? yes, uid=0,gid=2,mode=0666,bla bla bla DEVFS: OK, "null", uid=0,gid=2,mode=0666 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.