From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 19:32:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461C01065670 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam.strohl@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243048FC1B for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34BDCBCBA9; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:13:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F468FF3.8070004@ateamsystems.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:13:55 +0700 From: Adam Strohl Organization: A-Team Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff References: <4F46847D.4010908@my.gd> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030800080503090607030902" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:32:06 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030800080503090607030902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/24/2012 1:39, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > >> Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarmi= ng >> and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. >> >> In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it = in >> production :( >> >> I'd love to hear feedback. > Feedback: If you're worried, wait until you aren't. Thorough testing ahead of time will either make you confident or give=20 you the option to report issues which affect you directly (and help=20 improve FreeBSD). I say that having run into one issue with 9.0 (and reported it). I am=20 still using and deploying more 9.0 servers into production. My .02. --------------ms030800080503090607030902--