Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Mar 1997 23:52:04 +0400 (MSD)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>, Kevin Eliuk <kevin_eliuk@sunshine.net>, FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, peter@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Error installing pine-3.96 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000@nagual.ru>
In-Reply-To: <E0wBmu5-0007AB-00@rover.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Warner Losh wrote:

> : > It is in 2.2, but not 2.1.7.  The original poster was using 2.1.7.
> : 
> : So, it is not an issue at all, this port should work for 2.2 :-)
> 
> This is not an issue for Jordan's proposed plan.  This is an issue if
> there is a simple thing that can be done to make ports more useful on
> 2.1.x, which so far hasn't been shown by people asking me to make this
> change.

But as I remember Jordan talk about 2.2 compatibility only, not 2.1.7
compatibility... What is real subject now? 2.2, 2.1 or both compatibility?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000>