From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Mar 31 11:57:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA06290
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sovcom.kiae.su (sovcom.kiae.su [193.125.152.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA06247;
          Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by sovcom.kiae.su id AA25668
  (5.65.kiae-1 ); Mon, 31 Mar 1997 22:52:42 +0300
Received: by sovcom.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Mon, 31 Mar 97 22:52:41 +0300
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA00597;
	Mon, 31 Mar 1997 23:52:07 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 23:52:04 +0400 (MSD)
From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru>
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>,
        John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>,
        Kevin Eliuk <kevin_eliuk@sunshine.net>,
        FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, peter@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Error installing pine-3.96 
In-Reply-To: <E0wBmu5-0007AB-00@rover.village.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000@nagual.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Warner Losh wrote:

> : > It is in 2.2, but not 2.1.7.  The original poster was using 2.1.7.
> : 
> : So, it is not an issue at all, this port should work for 2.2 :-)
> 
> This is not an issue for Jordan's proposed plan.  This is an issue if
> there is a simple thing that can be done to make ports more useful on
> 2.1.x, which so far hasn't been shown by people asking me to make this
> change.

But as I remember Jordan talk about 2.2 compatibility only, not 2.1.7
compatibility... What is real subject now? 2.2, 2.1 or both compatibility?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/