From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 18 9: 0:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117C37B401 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F102243FAF for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:00:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wa1ter@myrealbox.com) Received: from myrealbox.com (ppp-67-118-133-215.dialup.irvnca.pacbell.net [67.118.133.215]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.3 patch/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2IH05OU319384 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:00:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3E7750A2.60404@myrealbox.com> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:00:18 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030213 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why did INVARIANTS hide the geom bug? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > walt writes: >>... Looking thru sys/geom I don't see any >>such ifdefs in your code, so I still don't know why the >>recent geom bug was hidden by INVARIANTS. > > > On the contrary, there is a lot on INVARIANTS-specific code in GEOM: > > des@dwp /sys/geom% grep -r KASSERT . | wc -l > 120 Thanks. That was a good explanation in only one line of code ;0) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message