From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Jul 21 07:59:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B8BA07A1 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jg@internetx.com) Received: from mx1.internetx.com (mx1.internetx.com [62.116.129.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E925A12CB for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jg@internetx.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EA64C4C7BD; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:52:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: InterNetX GmbH amavisd-new at ix-mailer.internetx.de Received: from mx1.internetx.com ([62.116.129.39]) by localhost (ix-mailer.internetx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xt8t7kvo5dy; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.26] (pizza.internetx.de [62.116.129.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F054C4C4C846; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:52:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP References: <20160630163541.GC5695@mordor.lan> <50BF1AEF-3ECC-4C30-B8E1-678E02735BB5@gmail.com> <20160701084717.GE5695@mordor.lan> <47c7e1a5-6ae8-689c-9c2d-bb92f659ea43@internetx.com> <20160701101524.GF5695@mordor.lan> <20160701105735.GG5695@mordor.lan> <3d8c7c89-b24e-9810-f3c2-11ec1e15c948@internetx.com> <93E50E6B-8248-43B5-BE94-D94D53050E06@getsomewhere.net> <20160701143917.GB41276@mordor.lan> <01b8a61e-739e-c41e-45bc-a84af0a9d8ab@internetx.com> <4d13f123-de18-693a-f98b-d02c8864f02e@internetx.com> <98EE5DDB-64E7-4809-B300-AF4E02F30C24@gmail.com> To: Ben RUBSON , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter Reply-To: jg@internetx.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:51:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98EE5DDB-64E7-4809-B300-AF4E02F30C24@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:59:11 -0000 i whould not expect to see something like maybe 2040 or so. no offense agains the zfs devs, imho the fs itself is not the right place for this. I could be wrong, if yes someone please feel free to point at it. In the End, to me it looks like you have taken the most important features out of hast, carp and probably rsf-1 cluster and with some mixing and stirring one can get a solution like this. no wont work, (somehow yes, but rather no: i dont know of anyone missing active sync replication, and manpower for this important parts is limited, but afaik theres the possility to sponsor such an addon. like, shut up and take my money Am 21.07.2016 um 07:52 schrieb Ben RUBSON: > >> On 01 Jul 2016, at 17:02, Ben RUBSON wrote: >> >> I think what we miss is some kind of this : >> http://milek.blogspot.fr/2007/03/zfs-online-replication.html >> http://www.compnect.net/?p=16461 >> >> Online replication built in ZFS would be awesome. > > Note that I opened the following feature request a few days ago : > https://www.illumos.org/issues/7166 > > Could be interesting to follow it. > > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >