Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:40:15 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/64659: natd not work Message-ID: <200403261940.i2QJeFLC070062@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/64659; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Dmitry Brazhnikov <Dmitry.Brazhnikov@ncc.volga.ru> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/64659: natd not work Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:34:56 +0300 (MSK) On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, 08:06-0800, Dmitry Brazhnikov wrote: > > >Number: 64659 > >Category: kern > >Synopsis: natd not work > >Confidential: no > >Severity: serious > >Priority: high > >Responsible: freebsd-bugs > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: sw-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 24 08:10:19 PST 2004 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Dmitry Brazhnikov > >Release: 5.2.1 > >Organization: > NCC > >Environment: > FreeBSD mail.stopol.tlt.ru 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 #3: Mon Mar 22 22:27:20 SAMT 2004 root@mail.stopol.tlt.ru:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAIL i386 > > > >Description: > I read man natd > I build kernel with options > IPFIREWALL & IPDIVERT for natd install and reboot system. > After reboot nat not work. > Using FreeBSD from 2.2.7 > > ed0: <NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029)> port 0x6500-0x651f irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 > ed0: address 00:60:52:09:24:d7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > rl0: <D-Link DFE-530TX+ 10/100BaseTX> port 0x6600-0x66ff mem 0xe3000000-0xe30000ff irq 9 at device 11.0 on pci > 0 > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:5f:a0:f9 > miibus0: <MII bus> on rl0 > rlphy0: <RealTek internal media interface> on miibus0 > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > > >How-To-Repeat: > rebuild kernel and run natd > >Fix: > i don`t know - trouble in natd or kernel. This is not a correct Problem Report. Please be more specific about your setup, show your ipfw(8) rules and natd(8) logs. And I am pretty sure Severity: serious and Priority: high are not adequate. We have a good article about writing PR: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/problem-reports/ Thanks. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403261940.i2QJeFLC070062>