From owner-cvs-all Wed Jun 30 15:20:36 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3594D1583A; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA20379; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:24:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:24:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ac ac.8 ac.c In-Reply-To: <36708.930780110@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 1 July 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Why document that, nothing else does. > > You're wrong about that. At least cat(1) sets a precedent, and that's > the first page I looked at while looking for one. And if you read my mail the entire way down you'll notice that I mentioned cat(1) as something that includes it in the synopsis, but not in the description. > As an aside, it's good practice to look at the PR's associated with a > commit before criticizing it. I only mention this because your question > was directed at me, and not Mr Wollman. :-) I don't commit every PR blindly. The question was more a general opinion/consensus question then one blaming anyone, as well. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message