From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 6 11:29:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C7316A41F for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:29:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28A843D48 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:29:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFACFBC6D; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) To: Yar Tikhiy From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:21:05 +0400." <20051006112105.GA76625@comp.chem.msu.su> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:29:46 +0200 Message-ID: <10734.1128598186@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any reason for no ostrip? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:29:49 -0000 In message <20051006112105.GA76625@comp.chem.msu.su>, Yar Tikhiy writes: >On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:32:05PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Ohh right, ptys don't implement all of that. Well, if you can find a free bit somewhere which does not conflict with POSIX, Linux and other desirable emuluation targets, I don't see why not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.