From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 12 08:16:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA10240 for current-outgoing; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 08:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA10232 Fri, 12 Apr 1996 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA07263; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:16:37 -0600 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:16:37 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199604121516.JAA07263@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Paul Traina Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: feedback sought on proposed change to netstart In-Reply-To: <199604120527.WAA23125@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199604120527.WAA23125@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Currently /etc/netstart evaluates /etc/start_if. if the file exists, > and THEN does any standard ifconfig commands if defined. > > This seems very backwards and broken to me. Here's my justification: > Basic stuff can be done by executing the commands in sysconfig, just like > we always do. /etc/start_if. is for additional stuff or exceptions, > such as configuring aliases. > > It makes sense to set up the interface, first, and then get fancy with it. In some cases I agree. With SLIP this is what you do, but with PPP you can't do anything until the line is up, which auto-configures it. I'm not sure the new way is any better/worse, but I'm not opposed to either. Nate