From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 5 08:31:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAF616A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 08:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts5.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F247F43D5E for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 08:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@interpool.ca) Received: from interpool.homeunix.com ([216.209.73.183]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.netSMTP <20040405153134.UNPZ18104.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@interpool.homeunix.com> for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:31:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:31:31 -0400 From: Gerry Freymann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040405113131.5652722a.lists@interpool.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040405152246.GB9817@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20040402164928.GA70822@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <1080932364.343.6.camel@lithium.stabilia.com> <20040404212443.GA70678@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20040405122755.GA97979@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20040405140101.GA759@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20040405105348.097f89f2.lists@interpool.ca> <20040405152246.GB9817@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: Interpool Development www.interpool.ca X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libintl.so.5 not found and general ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:31:43 -0000 On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:22:46 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: |O|>libintl.so is provided by the devel/gettext port. Except that at the |O|>moment it supplies libintl.so.6. |O|> # portupgrade -fr gettext I could have sworn I've already done this. Probably did, but something else mucked it up. I'll have the computer do this again and see what happens. |O|>That's because you've got multiple versions of those ports installed |O|>simultaneously. Which is fine, for all of the examples you show, as |O|>they are all designed to be able to do that. Sounds good then. Thanks for your response. -gerry