From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 13 02:36:25 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id CAA23510 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 02:36:25 -0700 Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA23504 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 02:36:22 -0700 Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0t3gXH-0003vyC; Fri, 13 Oct 95 02:36 PDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA01360; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:36:13 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: John Hay , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPX now available In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Oct 1995 15:30:13 MST." <3376.813537013@time.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 10:36:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1358.813576972@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > If we are going to import it, I will create diffs for the Makefiles and > > the two functions and the man page (ipx_addr(), ipx_ntoa() and ipx.3) for t he > m > > in libc that should be added. > > Relative to -current, right? That would be great! Could I raise an issue here ? I don't think we should add any IPX stuff in libc. It doesn't belong there based on a projectede frequency of use. Can we agree on libipx.a ? Yes, before you ask: I would really prefer a libtcpip.a too, but I also realize it's not practical. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. It will be some time yet before progress goes too far... (Poul Henningsen)