From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 23:22:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BE9106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350CE8FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1757015yie.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bEWNnT0RehLr+uomT861Fi72i6N2bijO6vnrgPej1qY=; b=VOTsziKFGfW1ppDvdCGSBL7l6WvDgYoJgv3zND0mDpyOf4Xp/2qzyg0TH0EVcrD+43 hFOXgfqqaifMdu1Qv2K48yOb9YpYKh8yp+WPVAGKm/fUCgZ3xnCjcBdG6MMFs15zR0Pg FhdKI70ZXfStM3Ja6eUq0axS5+JmNLbM6NsR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lrRCZWNVakGInX+gjit4YW4GPGAisl3reLlwNrGkuqpH/c+6oJdm4RoziHOi0+l7gK adE1j/2DDUOnFt7aj3aN7WbXfDpNaD0uLasEhI6KCONkcbf6bjd6lodJnJwJ8KDbeIHO yB8HyXg8nycgdCRur6V8NC5HvCelmBNiK4BzY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.152.37 with SMTP id e37mr2543019ano.124.1307229330624; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.227.17 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> References: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:15:30 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart or old style slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:22:45 -0000 On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Erik N=F8rgaard wro= te: > - or any problems (problems as in I've never tried that before) - using > gpart instead of the "old" scheme? Sorry for the double post, but the only problem that I've encountered is after creating a encrypted provider with geli(8), that provider cannot be partitioned using the GPT scheme. You can still partition it using gpart(8), but the scheme must be BSD or MBR. I am not sure whether this is a bug or just the way GPT partitions work, but it is not that big of a problem unless you want to have very large encrypted providers that are GPT scheme partitions.