From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 18:04:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C82716A905 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44B643D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:04:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [80.229.231.20] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1FlrXU-000715-4i for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: <447F2C3B.3010709@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:04:43 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Chat References: <447F2695.40603@freebsd.org> <2FAE5E5F-3BD1-44DD-8879-6CDC9A5C51A2@sepulcrum.org> In-Reply-To: <2FAE5E5F-3BD1-44DD-8879-6CDC9A5C51A2@sepulcrum.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Record Uptimes X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:04:59 -0000 Liam J. Foy wrote: > On 1 Jun 2006, at 18:40, Mark Ovens wrote: > >> Respectable showing from FreeBSD here >> >> http://en.uptime-project.net/page.php?page=toplist&content=allhosts > > More than showing me how stable the operating system is - it scares me. > Indeed. I've just registered and installed the s/w on my mail server and I'm already in position 3514/11582 with just over 3 weeks uptime - since I did a major u/g from 4.9 -> 6.1 - let's see how far it gets. The longest it's been up for is ~220 days but that's because we have a flaky mains supply round here (electric company more interested in their shareholders than customers). Perhaps now it's time to get a UPS? Mark