From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 28 03:10:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00708AA for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF18F4D for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9S3Ai7W017526 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:10:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188032] [lo] IPv6 on lo never leaves 'tentative' state if configured with prefixlen 128 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:10:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: js@jschneider.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:10:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188032 js@jschneider.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |js@jschneider.com --- Comment #8 from js@jschneider.com --- I was pulling my hair out all day trying to figure out why my jails weren't working with IPv6, and finally figured out they couldn't use their assigned IP addresses. A few hours later I noticed the "tentative" in ifconfig and eventually stumbled on this PR. IMO, the lack of "ipv6_activate_all_interfaces" should have no effect on the status of the interfaces when they're explicitly configured in jail settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.