Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 08:41:38 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PowerMac G4 graphics issue Message-ID: <20140330084137.GA73481@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140330073331.GB30090@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081108120019.440D2106570D@hub.freebsd.org> <762295.44650.qm@web33105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20140329105152.GA73812@FreeBSD.org> <20140329124227.GA22005@FreeBSD.org> <CAHSQbTAy89HtJHfq1CmDGyygNwOVSh_19NnESgjvX1WhpdMDDQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140329164046.GA7227@FreeBSD.org> <20140329100217.505671e8@zhabar.att.net> <20140330073331.GB30090@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:33:31AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > That's true, I don't have r200_dri.so there, but I do have radeon_dri.so; > why X is trying to load r200 one? Looks like r200 is correct for newer Radeons. Adding R200 to DRI_DRIVERS in /usr/ports/graphics/dri/Makefile and rebuilding/reinstalling the port made it available, but apparently it was disabled for reason, as it doesn't work: (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable ... (EE) AIGLX error: r200 does not export required DRI extension libGL with verbose debugging also reports: libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.3.0 r200 (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/local/lib/dri/r200_dri.so libGL error: failed to load driver: r200 libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/local/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so Does NEW_XORG implies DRI2, or there's a fallback of some sort that can be used as a workaround? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140330084137.GA73481>