From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 20 10:22:45 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2CC16A4D0
	for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201C443F85
	for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:22:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com
	[192.168.36.3]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/NinthNine) with SMTP
	id hAKIMg8X016693; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:22:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from
	nork@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:22:42 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200311201822.hAKIMg8X016693@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <3FBD02FA.3080805@isi.edu>
References: <200311191611.hAJGBcaa078764@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
	<3FBC1F44.6060309@isi.edu>
	<200311200218.hAK2Icab093548@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
	<3FBD02FA.3080805@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: which flash? (plugins, wrappers)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:22:45 -0000

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:07:54 -0800
Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU> wrote:
> > 	Maybe, flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 and linux-flashplugin-5.0r51.
> > 	Or new linuxpluginwrapper-20031120(not committed) and
> > 	linux-flashplugin6-6.0r79.
> Two short questions:
> - Should I uninstall one before install another?

	Yes.  Because of CONFLICTS these ports on runtime.

> - Is it the intention to have a generic linux plugin wrapper (hence
>    the name)? Or I'd suggest following the naming convention of
>    flashpluginwrapperX (X=6 in this case) rather than having yet
>    another name which is IMHO not very intuitive for someone
>    not following the list. :-)

	Linux Plugin Wrapper supports Flash6 and Acrobat5.
	In theory, it has a availability which is support
	other plugins for linux.

> >>My current browser is mozilla 1.5, but will probably upgrade to
> >>1.6a soon.
> > 	Please wait until commit linuxpluginwrapper, if you use Flash6.
> Sure. And thanks for the good works!

	Committed.  Please!