From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May  5 11:16:41 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E358337BC22
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  5 May 2000 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA80655;
	Fri, 5 May 2000 11:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200005051816.LAA80655@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not statically  linked
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10005051007040.15583-100000@semuta.feral.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:
:Can anyone think of a reason to *not* have mt statically linked?
:
:-matt

    There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
    /usr/bin.  On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
    to /bin.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message