From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 28  5:48:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BE80F37B40A; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 05:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vega.vega.com (h72.229.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.229.72])
	by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA71209;
	Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:47:51 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vega.vega.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8SClJA58842;
	Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:47:19 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <3BB471BD.976B65B6@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:49:01 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: closing down the squid22/23 ports?
References: <20010927205912.E4232@roaming.cacheboy.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Pardon the cross-posting. :-)
>
> I'd like to look at closing down / making inactive the squid22 and
> squid23 ports. The squid-2.2 and squid-2.3 codebases have been
> inactive and largely unsupported by the squid developers (read: myself
> inclusive here) for some time now, and I'd like to point users
> at the actively developed/maintained squid branch.
>
> Squid-2.5 is also in the pipeline for release soon, and I don't think
> there is a point in having 4 squid ports.
>
> What do people think?
>
> (please CC me, I'm currently not on the ports/hackers list
> for various time-related reasons..)

I'm pretty sure that squid22 could be safely killed, but perhaps it would have
a sense to keep squid23 around for some more time, because many production
systems out there still use it.

-Maxim


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message