From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 04:17:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA06A9B2EB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 04:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBC01FB5 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 04:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id bc4so24086069lbc.2 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:17:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dDDg4BjNqZNnUFGTt4kU9ZoidCZRxn1kWnsxcQM6u4c=; b=ExHVNcM60mhsORbzYJYeWnxOm6iSyZrckSp1kkmKSgZcy7Su8TXQfQODIULGCYchph dANNvB8SdPFds1RS/GMjux2ciS/gNHW6NVqpQzA3XM34y32FKKiNDP45T6nirZUzTJCA fJnLeShl/RHog+Lx3e9798lhxTW/gs8r/PCplzbVSJPwF9odzewEtOWXZvm6Mlfv06mR ah9u6ObF4idj6o7+lqifKz0EX+wmKfuOue6YgYh1RQUrOIagCTKzGLohtPcbLdDtigBQ qCghVRA6GRa+AqWxSkDxC4tHe/aWaH2I6Uy2YF8V57NvCvKSuioTqSuShTx5DTrL4ji1 ZLBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dDDg4BjNqZNnUFGTt4kU9ZoidCZRxn1kWnsxcQM6u4c=; b=Ei/2O3i3Gk53g5GKMCeOyj5LqpXejVgtQRGZjhQkW0PmfCGA3zel7QUvidkNex6DN+ OKdt/KnCe+3d7BzpLA7G6+60w70ywkzEJrweCJi8NMqhwY3s5belKEW9GKpJ0SoQbpwS yENBTTVU2nifmf8hGi7ouqBQhWglrjG+L/V3h+5YpsKHdH8h9tBq3gE7uQ9zcJJiu0+4 PbLJR8ScxyfBEnKTDFbTk9qSISJGMQmcC6wJ8qmC3ZZxdDWxhbqVEY/iOsGLg5WYli+a YOMcEVKa/rdzZK/XI2THDu+EY9bX+gSH7sfKGrdrq1Tqu0Rc0iMxDoJmTMipcEzjBsXi 4AQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTm0Yn89hw2IbyxF2Uco1A6NWh08U7pkT2pURU8euDyhcOTT11ht+jCsCkY8neluFU4D22ySJmOjWoYGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.162.231 with SMTP id yd7mr2484958lbb.40.1454559421064; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:17:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.160.133 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:17:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56B2B854.2030904@shrew.net> References: <56B2B854.2030904@shrew.net> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:17:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Requesting MFC's From: NGie Cooper To: Matthew Grooms Cc: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 04:17:04 -0000 On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: > All, > > What is the correct way to request that patches be committed to STABLE? In > particular, I'd really like to see these in 10.3-RELEASE as they have been > required to build a working firewall in some cases. All are related to > problems that were fixed in HEAD, but never MFC'd ... > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=264915 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=272695 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=288529 > > Thanks in advance, Email the committer about MFCing the change (or another party that has sufficient means to understand the change and potentially test it)? Thanks! -Ngie