From nobody Wed Oct 9 18:36:09 2024 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XP1mq2ML7z5Yrj8 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 18:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XP1mq1jVgz4HZS for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728498971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m//nUCa7yDWq1+sUSiA63L9lf3YtXHubW1IAfvl6yFA=; b=tiZKlAB/obtnNtN5U5JBCj8VT68N63Y25V/syKJkdN62PoMh7ctnPSlMYaW4ddFkgXdpzV f6FnOFdWtH+F3YpnNCqXxKYoCQi87vLt78GTDU12nnAhuRPaG6KBHH9biWaB4FDQTww9d4 sRNx12sFitBzHvKCAJF3Mv654YQaQ3nUYQF8+iUImwm7XkwGDoX3CegOlCgghVVpQ+jUJl 2ehj3//8G/Lbrg8RtmrTmoa3Ry2o0T4XG4qnBhAvodA9+OoiXKCm7LsTECc4FNmOD2elrf HiF/22fX+1+zSCFKOzSzCWhUelcLedkY7b0+Vd5a8HEjZT+XlhuDJuyej5EwaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728498971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m//nUCa7yDWq1+sUSiA63L9lf3YtXHubW1IAfvl6yFA=; b=NI0hGDZlDlVjrAOsvKNfb1aqOx/ThFLMGOYoAtO5iA5KCQ7oT+bA36mxkAas56O+JiD7f3 axVUi7VoHd7g3eC1dmvPyCKKwgqfHrANJEIccdQw1UyT++oXuM9MSVllJp4Y5UPqIuqtnM 1krgDYA0xExY4OPbDELvvNWewTFUEhv/iYcjjP6XPDXyompaEL9rsGU3EEtFXzRI06DT7g PwkzDFTFELgjwzwaPDoKnHTNUPZWh4LCmNKMB2wi3KIE5tfOBqe+z3pFMR8Gu1KD/R8bWh sXpnoLudF8hli9UX22oXWBCxrfTu3FbvOF0ebMNbYTgsIDLtb3VPpEySJxlMTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728498971; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lSj9RPGNBuRSWwEi3ypdAfo4LG1hUUm7wHNCqbfkgK13d8uQ2NVpvMrtQwtCrBLG3QlMRY A03k6ZMVXvk6+0H9K3+FZ639hAFRpk7Dh6RL9llWeYquCAgqe4TNt1EsbKYNgFwIHxr6va iow+oqnH7E74pbIbQknagevVm3QMalLHz3PfqUkRWyP3lQqMPCtaWsZqXoHC4428QDxrpQ suy+CiovPsOy8Cx269BfihZ7W0oK83hlr2zH4cRjkuqDyLyokeYlaNwt3z259b/enlJuoO cjZdHmHF07LNkR3v85rBxXVwdIUWyp0LCElpnTFeDK83qUdNJLDwOhRu/KyAbg== Received: from [10.9.4.95] (unknown [209.182.120.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: kevans/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XP1mq02N3z1F2V for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:36:09 -0500 List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: wireguard confusion To: questions@freebsd.org References: <29044f1d-f835-459d-8e1c-17832580b5d9@FreeBSD.org> <20241008024304.5ff138a9@Hydrogen> <4e50caf7-dd15-4c8c-9a69-b2f7dbee8b46@FreeBSD.org> <20241009014801.60e084f9@Hydrogen> <9f0e1fff-daf5-4dd5-a972-1ed73618533a@FreeBSD.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Kyle Evans In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/9/24 13:25, fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 07:54:40PM GMT, Kyle Evans wrote: > >> the version in base comes along quite far after the version in ports >> and the ports script just hasn't been adopted to use it. > > I am still confused by this bit. The --version output is the same for > both. If there are freebsd specific patches maybe the --version should > be tweaked to make that obvious. > There are no FreeBSD specific patches today. >> The version in base is technically safer, though, as we could >> theoretically change the configuration interface for wg interfaces >> and the version in base is generally guaranteed to work with the >> kmod that it ships with. > > I can understand this part. But why can't we just adopt the rc.script > into base, too, and get rid of the port entirely? > The rc script requires wg-quick(8), which relies on bash. We could do it, but I don't personally have time. Thanks, Kyle Evans